Online.
Offline. Behaviorism. Cognitivism. Just a few trigger words when discussing how
individuals learn. The purpose of this essay is to take a reflective and
introspective look at how I have learned, currently learn, and
hopefully, will learn taking into account my Personal Learning Network
(PLN) and different learning theories.
One
of the first activities I took part in beginning my graduate studies was to
create a Personal Learning Network; a web connecting me to all the different
mediums of learning. Upon reflection of my PLN, I found, as did all of my
classmates, that there was a divide in our networks which we classified as
online and offline learning. Quoting Richardson and Mancabelli online, the
University of Southampton states:
In
our PLNs, we learn what we want to learn using the vast resources and people
online (or off) that can help us learn it. Each of our networks is unique,
created and developed to our personalised learning goals that evolve and grow
throughout our lives. (2017)
Classified as a ‘millennial’, it came as no surprise that my
own PLN was made up of a majority of online resources; Google, Siri, TedTalks,
BBC News, Netflix, YouTube, Facebook, to name just a few. In fact, I didn’t
realize just how internet-dependent I had become and I had to question whether
that was a “lesser way” of learning. Did it count as learning if I wasn’t
memorizing or remembering facts I was exposing myself to? Even skills that I
learned offline have become relevant online, such as reading articles online
for classes rather than out of a physical book. However, in a world where
access to information is so available, I’ve decided that learning to find
information is just as valuable as knowing the information from memory.
In terms of
offline resources my PLN contained three main types: physical print (books,
newspapers, magazines, etc.), people, and experiences. I started creating my
PLN by asking myself who I turn to for help—professors, friends, parents,
siblings, coaches, all came to mind. Additionally, I have always enjoyed
reading and even now prefer holding a book in my hand to reading on my phone or
computer. When reviewing my PLN for class I wrote:
…life experiences shape our learning and should be, in my
opinion, heavily included in our PLNs. My life wouldn't be the same if I hadn't
lived and taught in Mexico, where I experienced a huge learning curve in terms
of language and culture. Work experience shapes our knowledge as well…”
(Tolbert 2019a).
While so much of my PLN is an
online resource, I think I still find my offline resources more valuable to my
life and learning.
Reviewing
past learning theories has helped me in identifying how I learned as a child. On
my blog Ed Thoughts, I shared an image that put the four main learning
theories (behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism, and connectivism) on a
timeline (Tolbert 2019b). Although Behaviorism was taken over by Cognitivism in
the early 20th century and both peaked in popularity before I was born,
aspects of my education carry qualities of both learning theories. For example
in a presentation on these learning theories given by Professor James Stanfield
a table showed the type of learning to best describe Behaviorism was task-based
learning (2019, slide 19) which was very apparent in my elementary school years.
However, at the age of ten I was selected to take part in a “Gifted and
Talented” program in my school district which was meant to provide challenge
and “new style” learning to high achieving students. This “new style” was very
cognitivist in its approach, focusing on reasoning and problem solving
(Stanfield 2019, slide 19). “According to Piaget (1958), …problem-solving
skills cannot be taught, they must be discovered” which is why Piaget suggested
learning required an active participant. He argued that children learn in developmental
stages and that they “should not be taught certain concepts until they have
reached the appropriate stage of cognitive development” (McLeod 2018). I often
wonder if the characteristics of these early learning theories being evident in
my education originated from the age of my teachers, the fact I was living in a
small, rural town, or my own development at the time. Regardless, in many ways
this gave me an advantage to learning in middle- and high-school where more
responsibility of learning fell to the students to think critically and problem
solve. This shift in learning styles continued as I went through high school
and entered university for the first time.
It
was while pursuing my teaching degree that I really experienced learning as a
social construct, a main quality of the Constructivist learning theory; however,
by this point I was also learning largely using online resources, relying less
and less on teachers and professors imparting their knowledge, a quality of Connectivism.
Looking back at my PLN I’ve decided that I don’t want to lose the importance of
reading printed books and that I do want to try to expand my PLN by learning
new skills/hobbies, reading blogs related to my interests written by people
with experience in their specific field/craft, and stay open to experiences. The
notion of digital literacy, social networking, and learning from experience
really shaped how I learn now as an adult, and how I my own role as a teacher was
informed and influenced. I anticipate my learning in the future will follow
this pattern as I am in deep agreement with the idea that “people construct
their own understanding and knowledge of the world, through experiencing things
and reflecting on those experiences” (Stanfield 2019b), but I cannot deny the
importance of connecting oneself to networks both on and offline.
Word count:
948
References
Inhelder, B. and Piaget, J., 1958. The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence: An essay on the construction of formal operational structures (Vol. 22). Psychology Press.
Inhelder, B. and Piaget, J., 1958. The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence: An essay on the construction of formal operational structures (Vol. 22). Psychology Press.
McLeod, S.
(2018). Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive Development [online]. SimplyPsychology.
[Viewed 27 October 2019]. Available from: https://www.simplypsychology.org/piaget.html
Richardson, W. and Mancabelli, R., 2011. Personal learning networks: Using the power of connections to transform education. Solution Tree Press.
Stanfield,
J. (2019a). Lecture 2: Theories of learning part 1 [PowerPoint
presentation]. EDU8213, Future of Learning. 8 October. [Accessed 27 October
2019]. Available from: https://blackboard.ncl.ac.uk/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_91245_1&content_id=_3993101_1
Stanfield,
J. (2019b). Lecture:Theories of Learning Part II [PowerPoint
presentation]. EDU8213, Future of Learning. 15 October. [Accessed 27 October 2019].
Available from: https://blackboard.ncl.ac.uk/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_91245_1&content_id=_3993102_1
Tolbert,
C. (2019a). My personal learning network. Ed Thoughts [online]. 3
October 2019. [Viewed 27 October 2019]. Available from: https://futureoflearning2019.blogspot.com/2019/10/my-personal-learning-network.html
Tolbert,
C. (2019b). Is connectivism as a learning theory bogus? Ed thoughts [online].
16 October 2019. [Viewed 27 October 2019]. Available from: https://futureoflearning2019.blogspot.com/
Great first essay. A few top tips:
ReplyDelete- create a digital version of your PLN and include this
- Piaget & Richardson and Mancabelli are missing from the reference list
- Instead of referencing me try and include references to some of the key authors.
- ideally you would include approx 10 different references